Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation summary analysis of each district’s health system performance, October 2018 – September; 2019.

From: Accelerating the performance of district health systems towards achieving UHC via twinning partnerships

 

DHSP

DHSP

DHSP

Baseline

Mid-term

End-line

District Health System Performance (DHSP) - Baseline

 Pearson Correlation

1

  

 Sig. (2-tailed)

   

 N

8

  

District Health System Performance (DHSP) - Mid-term

 Pearson Correlation

.978**

1

 

 Sig. (2-tailed)

0.001

  

 N

8

8

 

District Health System Performance (DHSP) - End-line

 Pearson Correlation

.936**

.987**

1

 Sig. (2-tailed)

0.001

0.001

 

 N

8

8

8

  1. **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
  2. •Perfect: If the value is near ±1 then it said to be a perfect correlation; as one variable increases, the other variable tends to also increase (if positive) or decrease (if negative).
  3. •High degree: If the coefficient value lies between ±0.50 and ± 1 then it is said to be a strong correlation.
  4. •Moderate degree: If the value lies between ±0.30 and ± 0.49 then it is said to be a medium correlation.
  5. •Low degree: When the value lies below + 0.29 then it is said to be a small correlation.
  6. •No correlation: When the value is zero.