Skip to main content

Table 3 Results from retrospective database analyses (thyroid and cataract surgery)

From: Minimum volume standards in day surgery: a systematic review

 

Ayala and Yencha [15] (2015)

Chen et al. [16] (2014)

Keay et al. [17] (2012)

Country

USA

USA

USA

Sponsor

NA

NA

National Eye Institute: R01EY016769. K.K funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council post-doctoral fellowship. E.W.G. recipient of an Ernest and Elizabeth Althouse Special Scholar’s Award from Research to Prevent Blindness.

Conflict of Interest

One author (Yencha) was involved in all cases either as primary or assistant surgeon

None

None

Study design

Retrospective single centre analysis

Retrospective single centre chart review

Retrospective analysis of Medicare beneficiary claims data

Conducted in

2006–2014

2011–2012

2003–2004

Indication

Benign or malignant thyroid carcinoma

Cataract

Cataract

Intervention

Outpatient thyroid surgery/Thyroidectomy

Cataract Surgery (Phacoemulsification)

Cataract Surgery

Setting

Outpatient and Inpatienta

Outpatient Surgical Centre

Outpatient surgery centres

Type of volume analysis (surgeon/hospital)

Surgeon & Hospital

Surgeon

Surgeon

Comparator

Inpatient Thyroid surgery/Thyroidectomy

NA

NA

Number of pts, I vs C

160 (109 vs 51)b

3339

2,285,968c

Both eyes: 1,005,826 (44%)

One eye: 1,280,14221 (56%)

Number of procedures, I vs Cd

Total: 35 vs 26

Hemi: 62 vs 20

Completion: 11 vs 5

NA

3,280,966e

Number of surgeons

NA

4

11, 873f

Number of hospitals

1

1

NA

Surgeon/Surgeon volume categories, n (cases/year)

Unclearg

Surgeon 4: 411

Surgeon 1: 536

Surgeon 2: 1056

Surgeon 3: 1336

(1): 1–50;

(2): 51–200;

(3): 201–500;

(4): 501–1000;

(5): ≥1001

Hospital volume categories, n (cases/year)

Unclear

NA

NA

Operating time, median in min (range)

NA

NA

NA

Inclusion criteria

Patients in ASA class

1,2,3 and 4

Use of topical anaesthesia and performance of the intervention at an outpatient centre/setting

Patients with max. 2 cataract surgeries per beneficiary during the 2-year study timeframe; Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years

Exclusion criteria

NA

Patients requiring additional anaesthesia and those who were operated on in a hospital setting

Records were excluded if data indicated the surgery was not performed, the procedure was a return to the operating room for a related procedure or due to data coding issues; surgeries performed in the last 42 days of 2004

ASA class, n, I vs C

1 and 2: 90 vs 39

3 and 4: 19 vs 12

NA

NA

Co-interventions

Intravenous dexamethasone, intravenous antibiotics, anaesthesia at surgeon’s discretion, Prophylactic calcium carbonate and vitamin D (calcitriol) supplementation for pts. undergoing total or completion thyroidectomy

NA

NA

Age, mean, yrs (range) [SD]

41.8 (14–75)/47.8 (19–77)

73 (60–86) [3]

NA (≥65h)

Sex, female:male, n, I vs C

82:27 vs 25:26

13:10

NA

BMI ± SD

NA

NA

NA

Risk Adjustment

NA

NA

Age (65–74, 75–84, ≥85

Gender, Race, Year,

Ambulatory surgery centre (No, Yes),

Surgeon experience in yrs. (1–10, 11–20, 21–30, ≥30)

Other influencing factors

(Comorbidities etc.), n (%)

NA

Shallow chamber: 8 (35);

Miosis: 7 (30); Restlessness: 6 (26);

Floppy Iris: 6 (26);

Pseudoexfoliation: 5 (22);

Zonular dehiscence: 5 (22);

Small eye: 1 (4)

NA

Patients excluded from the analysis, n (%)

NA

NA

165,452 and 35,068i

Efficacy

Revision Surgery

NA

23j of 3339

NA

Re-admissionk, n (%), I vs C

0l vs NA

NA

NA

Surgical volume,

n (cases/year) – Risk of AE related

to surgery

NA

411–3.75;

536–0.37;

1056–0.28;

1336–0.29

PCR in 23 (0.68) in total

Nr. of TE cases:

1–50: 352;

51–200: 1455;

201–500: 1512;

501–1000: 454;

≥1001: 168

Overall Endoph. Rate/1000 surgeriesm (95% CI):

1–50: 2.57 (2.30–2.83);

51–200: 1.49 (1.42–1.57);

201–500: 1.17 (1.11–1.23);

501–1000: 0.80 (0.73–0.88);

≥1001: 0.62 (0.52–0.71)

Surgical volume,

n (cases/year) – Risk of AE related

to surgery

(continuation)

  

PCR: Unadjusted RR (95% CI):

1–50: 4.17 (3.47–5.01);

51–200: 2.42 (2.06–2.84);

201–500: 1.89 (1.61–2.22);

501–1000: 1.30 (1.09–1.55);

≥1001: 1.00 (Reference)

Adjusted RR: (95% CI):

1–50: 3.80 (3.13–4.61);

51–200: 2.32 (1.97–2.74);

201–500: 1.84 (1.56–2.17);

501–1000: 1.30 (1.09–1.56);

≥1001: 1.00 (Reference)

Safety

SAE

NA

NA

NA

AEs, Volume, n

(%),

19 pts. of 160 pts. (11,90%)n

Transient hypercalcemia: 5%;

Temporary vocal cord paralysis: 2.5%;

Bilateral vocal cord paralysis: 0.63%

Inadvertent transection of the RLN: 0.63%;

Post-operative seromas requiring aspiration: 1.9%;

Post-operative hematoma requiring aspiration: 1.25%

NA

NA

  1. NA Not available, PCR Post Cataract Endophthalmitis, SDS Same day surgery, SDT Same-day thyroidectomy, TE Total Endophthalmitis, TT Thyroidectomy, RLN Recurrent laryngeal nerve, RR Relative Risk
  2. aPatient who were eligible for same day discharge were observed typically for 2–4 h. Patients with significant co-morbidities, lack of social support, and/or patients not comfortable with outpatient recovery were admitted for observation
  3. bForty-three points were kept for 23 h observation and 17 (40%) of these patients were found to have social factors requiring an overnight stay (due to long distance, absence of responsible adult caregiver); remaining 26 pts. requiring a 23 h observation had significant co-morbidities
  4. cOwn calculation on the basis of the given numbers of patients (absolute and relative) with surgery on both eyes.
  5. dOutpatient (Intervention) vs Inpatient (Comparator)
  6. e35,068 surgeries could not have been attributed to a specific surgeon and also contain surgeries for which surgeon characteristics data were missing. Hence in the analysis 3,245,898 were included.
  7. fOwn calculation on the basis of the descriptive statistics of the endophthalmitis rate by annual Medicare surgical volume found in Table 4.
  8. gThresholds for MVS classification (i.e. low, medium, high) is not clear
  9. hAge info is not given in detail
  10. i165,452 Surgeries performed in the last 42 days in 2004 were excluded and in the analysis of the endophthalmitis rate by annual medicare surgical volume 35,068 surgeries with unique physician identification numbers that cannot be attributed to a specific surgeon and surgeries for which surgeon characteristics data were missing
  11. jFive of the 23 patients did not have sufficient support to place a posterior chamber or sulcus intraocular cataract lenses (IOL) and required placement of anterior chamber IOLs
  12. kRe-admission includes admission for 23-h observation or full admission (observation longer than 24 h)
  13. lOne pt. was discharged from the ER for symptoms of paresthesias with normal calcium levels
  14. mThis rate is overall for all surgeries within a specific annual volume category and does not reflect the average rate of endophthalmitis within each category
  15. nIt was unclear what AE occurred in the respective intervention arm