Skip to main content

Table 2 Manager opinions about implementation, implementation support and influence

From: Introduction of medication review and medication report in Swedish hospital and primary care, using a theory-based implementation strategy

 

Total

n (%)

County part A

n (%)

County

part B

n (%)

County

part C

n (%)

Difference between county parts*

Are you satisfied with how medication review/medication report was implemented at your clinic/centre?

    

p > 0.05

 Totally satisfied

34 (39)

7 (24)

20 (44)

7 (50)

 

 Quite satisfied

44 (50)

19 (66)

18 (40)

7 (50)

 

 Dissatisfied

10 (11)

3 (10)

7 (16)

0

 

 Very dissatisfied

0

0

0

0

 

 How did you perceive the support from the implementation team?

    

C > A (p < 0.05)

B > A (p < 0.01)

 Good

62 (72)

12 (44)

38 (84)

12 (86)

 

 Quite good

13 (15)

7 (26)

4 (9)

2 (14)

 

 Quite bad

5 (6)

3 (11)

2 (4)

0

 

 Bad

6 (7)

5 (18)

1 (2)

0

 

Did you perceive having an opportunity to influence the implementation process?

    

p > 0.05

 Totally

5 (6)

1 (4)

2 (4)

2 (14)

 

 Quite much

13 (15)

4 (14)

5 (11)

4 (27)

 

 Somehow

35 (40)

8 (29)

23 (50)

4 (27)

 

 Not at all

35 (40)

15 (54)

16 (35)

4 (27)

 

Are you satisfied with the influence you had over the implementation process?

    

C > A (p < 0.05)

B > A (p < 0.05)

 Totally satisfied

25 (35)

4 (17)

16 (43)

5 (50)

 

 Quite satisfied

33 (46)

12 (50)

16 (43)

5 (50)

 

 Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied

9 (13)

5 (21)

4 (11)

0

 

4 (6)

3 (12)

1 (3)

0

 
  1. * Calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test