Skip to main content

Table 2 Manager opinions about implementation, implementation support and influence

From: Introduction of medication review and medication report in Swedish hospital and primary care, using a theory-based implementation strategy

  Total
n (%)
County part A
n (%)
County
part B
n (%)
County
part C
n (%)
Difference between county parts*
Are you satisfied with how medication review/medication report was implemented at your clinic/centre?      p > 0.05
 Totally satisfied 34 (39) 7 (24) 20 (44) 7 (50)  
 Quite satisfied 44 (50) 19 (66) 18 (40) 7 (50)  
 Dissatisfied 10 (11) 3 (10) 7 (16) 0  
 Very dissatisfied 0 0 0 0  
 How did you perceive the support from the implementation team?      C > A (p < 0.05)
B > A (p < 0.01)
 Good 62 (72) 12 (44) 38 (84) 12 (86)  
 Quite good 13 (15) 7 (26) 4 (9) 2 (14)  
 Quite bad 5 (6) 3 (11) 2 (4) 0  
 Bad 6 (7) 5 (18) 1 (2) 0  
Did you perceive having an opportunity to influence the implementation process?      p > 0.05
 Totally 5 (6) 1 (4) 2 (4) 2 (14)  
 Quite much 13 (15) 4 (14) 5 (11) 4 (27)  
 Somehow 35 (40) 8 (29) 23 (50) 4 (27)  
 Not at all 35 (40) 15 (54) 16 (35) 4 (27)  
Are you satisfied with the influence you had over the implementation process?      C > A (p < 0.05)
B > A (p < 0.05)
 Totally satisfied 25 (35) 4 (17) 16 (43) 5 (50)  
 Quite satisfied 33 (46) 12 (50) 16 (43) 5 (50)  
 Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
9 (13) 5 (21) 4 (11) 0  
4 (6) 3 (12) 1 (3) 0  
  1. * Calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test