Peer Review reports
From: Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Alvarado |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 16 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael G. Pearson |
| 28 May 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 30 Jun 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Alvarado |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 30 Jun 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Jul 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael G. Pearson |
| 21 Jul 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 7 Aug 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Alvarado |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 7 Aug 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Aug 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Sep 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-020-05661-0 |
You can find further information about peer review here.