Skip to main content

Table 3 Distributions of the investigated variables

From: The impact of accessibility and service quality on the frequency of patient visits to the primary diabetes care provider: results from a cross-sectional survey performed in six European countries

 

English region

Finnish region

German region

Greek region

Dutch region

Spanish region

Total sample

Region differencesa

Control variablesb

 Gender

  Valid data

209

132

217

153

290

70

1071

 

  Male

64.6%

65.2%

53.9%

58.2%

59.3%

55.7%

59.6%

n.s.c

 Age in years

  Valid data

211

133

218

153

294

71

1080

 

  Mean (SD)

63.0 (11.9)

63.5 (9.6)

65.7 (11.2)

66.0 (10.6)

65.0 (10.0)

69.3 (11.4)

65.0 (10.9)

p < 0.001d

 Education

  Valid data

191

129

211

150

287

68

1036

 

  High

39.8%

59.7%

66.4%

27.3%

76.3%

26.5%

55.1%

p < 0.001c

 Stage of diabetes

  Valid data

204

124

207

125

276

63

999

 

  Diet only

13.7%

3.2%

7.7%

1.6%

19.9%

4.8%

10.8%

p < 0.001c

  Oral, no insulin

65.7%

69.4%

58.9%

68.8%

65.9%

63.5%

65.1%

  Insulin

20.6%

27.4%

33.3%

29.6%

14.1%

31.7%

24.1%

 Heart problems

  Valid data

207

126

193

144

284

70

1024

 

  Yes

25.1%

19.0%

21.8%

30.6%

14.8%

18.6%

21.2%

p < 0.01c

 Previous stroke

  Valid data

212

135

217

151

289

70

1074

 

  Yes

7.5%

2.2%

10.6%

6.0%

4.5%

5.7%

6.3%

p < 0.05c

 Problems with lower extremities

  Valid data

206

134

215

148

283

71

1057

 

  Yes

17.0%

12.7%

26.0%

12.2%

5.3%

15.5%

14.4%

p < 0.001c

 Problems with sight

  Valid data

210

133

216

151

292

70

1072

 

  Yes

24.3%

10.5%

17.6%

15.9%

8.6%

28.6%

16.0%

p < 0.001c

 Problems with kidney

  Valid data

207

133

212

145

286

71

1054

 

  Yes

0.5%

0.0%

0.9%

0.7%

0.0%

0.0%

0.4%

n.s.c

Focal predictorse

 Travel distance to provider in kilometres

 Mean (SD)

1.6 (2.9)

9.2 (10.7)

5.7 (6.1)

15.8 (20.6)

1.9 (1.8)

1.5 (1.3)

5.4 (10.4)

p < 0.001d

 Travel time to provider in minutes

  Mean (SD)

14.6 (9.9)

16.7 (11.5)

13.1 (9.2)

28.8 (25.9)

7.7 (5.1)

14.4 (9.8)

14.7 (14.2)

p < 0.001d

 In-practice waiting time in minutes

  Mean (SD)

18.5 (13.9)

13.7 (10.3)

43.6 (32.5)

52.8 (41.1)

12.9 (19.6)

38.2 (30.0)

27.5 (30.1)

p < 0.001d

 Quality of communicationf

  Mean (SD)

3.9 (1.2)

4.2 (1.0)

4.2 (1.1)

3.9 (1.3)

4.4 (1.0)

3.5 (1.5)

4.1 (1.2)

p < 0.001d

Criterion variablee

 Numbers of physician visits per year

  Mean (SD)

3.3 (3.0)

2.5 (1.4)

4.6 (4.0)

4.9 (4.3)

3.7 (1.3)

4.6 (5.9)

3.9 (3.3)

p < 0.001d

  1. a n.s. not significant
  2. b Valid data vary due to missing values
  3. c Pearson’s chi-square test
  4. Kruskal-Wallis teste
  5. e Valid data are identical with the numbers of participants included (see Table 1)
  6. f Coded from 1 for worst quality to 5 for best quality