Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of Meta-analysis of systolic blood pressure

From: Clinical and economic outcomes of hospital pharmaceutical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

| SMD

[95% Conf. Interval]

% Weight

Carter (1997) [8]

| -0.173

− 0.723

0.377

10.66

Carter (2009) [15]

| -0.596

−0.796

− 0.396

16.73

Schumacher (2018)

| -0.696

−0.927

−0.465

16.26

Korcegez (2017)

| -0.574

−0.899

− 0.250

14.65

Domingues (2017) [40]

| -0.301

−0.732

0.129

12.73

Javaid (2019) [42]

| -1.456

−1.844

−1.067

13.49

Shao (2017)

| -0.148

−0.426

0.131

15.47

D + L pooled RR

| -0.573

−0.851

−0.295

100.00

  1. Heterogeneity chi-squared = 33.52 (d.f. = 6) p = 0.000.
  2. I-squared (variation in SMD attributable to heterogeneity) =82.1%.
  3. Estimate of between-study variance Tau-squared = 0.1096.
  4. Test of SMD = 0: z = 4.04 p = 0.000.
  5. The significance level of the combined effect quantity test: 0.05.
  6. The significance level of the heterogeneity test: 0.1.
  7. Heterogeneity test: p > 0.1, no heterogeneity was considered; p < 0.1, heterogeneity was considered.