The effect of information on prostate cancer screening decision process: a discrete choice experiment

Table 4 Men’s preferences for prostate cancer screening based on main effect with interactions logit model

*Attribute*	Total (N = 779*7)
*Attribute*	Coefficients	P-value
*Constant*	−0.1357	0.1087
*ASC*_opt-ou	0.4164	< 0.0001
*PC mortality*	−76.7004	< 0.0001
*False positive*	−3.0794	< 0.0001
*False negative*	−20.0634	0.0011
*Overdiagnosis*	4.9651	0.0007
*Screening frequency*	0.00504	0.8536
*Out-of-pocket costs*	−0.0122	< 0.0001
*Effect of informative video*
*Watching informative video*
*no screening option	0.1737	< 0.0001
*No informative video access*
*false negative	−12.1888	0.0046
*Interactions with individual characteristics*
*Low level of health anxiety*
*no screening option	0.1563	< 0.0001
*PC mortality	10.0525	0.0485
*High level of health anxiety*
*no screening option	−0.2443	< 0.0001
*PC mortality	−13.2117	0.0080
*Irregular medical follow-up*
*no screening option	0.1523	< 0.0001
*Absence of medical research*
*no screening option	0.1882	< 0.0001
*Being involved in health decision process*
*no screening option	0.1602	< 0.0001
*No experience of cancer screening (prostate or colorectal)*
*no screening option	0.3930	< 0.0001
*Having experience of cancer screening (prostate or colorectal)*
*PC mortality	−15.3020	0.0005
*Monthly income < 3000€*
*out-of-pocket costs	0.00202	0.0222
*Worker status*
*no screening option	−0.1747	< 0.0001
*Managerial status*
*no screening option	−0.1140	< 0.0001
*Single/divorced/widower*
*no screening option	0.0969	< 0.0001
Statistical goodness of fit of model
*Pseudo R*²	0.1110

ISSN: 1472-6963