Skip to main content

Table 1 Bias reduction tests before and after matching based on the Kernel algorithm

From: Estimating the effectiveness of self-help groups on the adoption of secondary preventive measures by people living with HIV in Central America, 2012

Variable

 

Intervention

Control

%bias

%bias reduction

t test

P value

Sex (Male)

Without matching

0.548

0.510

7.7

–

1.97

0.048

Kernel

0.548

0.561

− 2.5

67.0

− 0.89

0.372

Age (years)

 Youth (18–24)

Without matching

0.122

0.092

10.0

–

2.48

0.013

Kernel

0.122

0.126

−1.1

89.4

−0.35

0.729

 Young adult (25–44)

Without matching

0.623

0.627

−0.9

–

−0.23

0.819

Kernel

0.623

0.626

−0.6

33.9

−0.21

0.836

 Mature adult (45–59)

Without matching

0.209

0.243

−8.3

–

−2.15

0.031

Kernel

0.209

0.215

−1.5

82.3

−0.53

0.600

 Older adult (≥60)

Without matching

0.046

0.038

4.1

–

1.03

0.302

Kernel

0.046

0.034

6.1

−48.4

2.19

0.029

Schooling

 None

Without matching

0.115

0.066

17.2

–

4.17

0.000

Kernel

0.115

0.097

6.4

62.5

2.09

0.036

 Literate

Without matching

0.029

0.032

−2.2

–

−0.56

0.573

Kernel

0.029

0.038

−5.2

−140.8

−1.76

0.079

 Completed elementary school

Without matching

0.367

0.449

−16.6

–

−4.28

0.000

Kernel

0.367

0.357

2.0

87.9

0.71

0.475

 Completed middle school

Without matching

0.383

0.376

1.4

–

0.35

0.724

Kernel

0.383

0.384

−0.2

87.8

−0.06

0.953

 University

Without matching

0.106

0.077

10.2

–

2.52

0.012

Kernel

0.106

0.125

−6.4

37.3

−2.01

0.044

Average monthly income

Without matching

205.760

182.180

10.4

–

2.61

0.009

Kernel

205.760

216.680

−4.8

53.7

−1.73

0.083

Yes, economic dependents

Without matching

0.634

0.593

8.4

–

2.16

0.031

Kernel

0.634

0.597

7.6

10.0

2.65

0.008

Sexual orientation

 Heterosexual

Without matching

0.789

0.749

9.5

–

2.47

0.014

Kernel

0.789

0.706

19.6

−106.2

6.68

0.000

 Bisexual

Without matching

0.071

0.066

1.9

–

0.49

0.621

Kernel

0.071

0.088

−7.0

− 258.3

−2.27

0.023

 Homosexual

Without matching

14,029.000

0.185

−12.2

–

−3.21

0.001

Kernel

0.140

0.205

−17.6

−44.6

−6.04

0.000

Yes, received counseling when tested for HIV.

Without matching

0.851

0.826

6.7

–

1.75

0.080

Kernel

0.851

0.793

15.6

−130.7

5.25

0.000

Yes, has suffered from tuberculosis.

Without matching

0.142

0.094

14.9

–

3.66

0.000

Kernel

0.142

0.137

1.4

90.6

0.45

0.650

Yes, receives family support.

Without matching

0.744

0.769

−5.8

–

−1.48

0.139

Kernel

0.744

0.751

−1.6

72.2

−0.56

0.576

Yes, has used drugs.

Without matching

0.109

0.179

−19.9

–

−5.34

0.000

Kernel

0.109

0.174

−18.5

6.8

−6.51

0.000

Yes, is currently in a stable relationship.

Without matching

0.452

0.432

3.9

–

1.01

0.312

Kernel

0.452

0.438

2.8

29.1

0.98

0.328

Future time perspective

Without matching

7.310

7.285

1.8

–

0.46

0.647

Kernel

7.310

7.180

9.1

− 410.0

3.12

0.002

Country

 El Salvador

Without matching

0.119

0.334

−52.9

–

−14.84

0.000

Kernel

0.119

0.110

2.4

95.4

1.08

0.281

 Belize

Without matching

0.102

0.021

34.0

–

7.67

0.000

Kernel

0.102

0.079

9.8

71.1

2.85

0.004

 Costa Rica

Without matching

0.087

0.287

−53.1

–

−15.25

0.000

Kernel

0.087

0.095

−2.2

95.9

−1.00

0.320

 Guatemala

Without matching

0.253

0.060

55.0

–

12.60

0.000

Kernel

0.253

0.237

4.5

91.7

1.30

0.195

 Honduras

Without matching

0.223

0.241

−4.3

–

−1.11

0.267

Kernel

0.223

0.230

−1.6

61.7

−0.58

0.561

 Panama

Without matching

0.216

0.057

47.6

–

10.95

0.000

Kernel

0.216

0.250

−10.2

78.7

−2.81

0.005

  1. Source: prepared by the author based on data from the following project: Elaboration of the risk profile of people living with HIV in the beneficiary countries of the REDCA+ Regional Program
  2. Information was obtained running the Stata 13.1 pstest command. Data were matched using the Kernel method after estimating the propensity score through a probit model. Matching took into account the region of common support and the balance of the variables presented in this table. Mean bias dropped from 15.6 to 6.2