Skip to main content

Table 5 Effect of KT-MCC Strategy on Per Round MCC Decision Making Quality

From: Use of the KT-MCC strategy to improve the quality of decision making for multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a pilot study

 

Attendance

Leadership

Inclusion of team members

Team Sociability

Mutual Respect

Personal Development

Meeting Venue

Technology & Equipment

Agenda

Prioritization of Case presentation

Availability of Patient Notes

Case Presentation

Patient Centered Care

Clarity of treatment plans

Presence of tension/conflicta

Summary Score of Overall MCC Quality

p-value for summary MCC quality score

Pre

3.14 (1.17)

2.41 (1.05)

3.14 (0.83)

3.59 (0.59)

3.23 (0.92)

1.50 (0.51)

3.77 (0.53)

5.00 (0.00)

2.62 (0.67)

3.55 (0.80)

4.00 (0.00)

2.16 (0.61)

1.32 (0.57)

2.17 (1.13)

−0.41 (0.96)

40.96 (4.46)

< 0.0001

Post

3.15 (1.25)

2.75 (1.15)

3.60 (0.84)

3.73 (0.64)

3.68 (0.69)

1.46 (0.60)

4.00 (0.00)

7.25 (1.32)

2.79 (0.47)

3.85 (0.48)

3.98 (0.16)

2.65 (0.59)

1.45 (0.75)

3.10 (0.76)

−0.08 (0.27)

47.30 (4.40)

 

MCC 1

MCC 2

MCC 3

MCC 4

Pre-Intervention MCC Quality Score

38.92 (4.20)

43.17 (4.62)

41.67 (5.16)

39.63 (2.93)

Post-Intervention MCC Quality Score

49.04 (2.23)

43.68 (5.07)

50.35 (2.89)

45.64 (3.54)

p-value

0.001

0.836

0.007

0.017

  1. Data presented in means (standard deviation)
  2. aEvaluated on a negative scale (lower scores demonstrate greater levels of tension/conflict)