Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of parameter estimation of LCA

From: Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment

Preference

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Coefficient

SE.

Z-value

Coefficient

SE.

Z-value

Coefficient

SE

Z value

Coefficient

SE

Z-value

Utility function

 TCMa

−0.4977***

0.0735

6.7624

0.4064

1.1446

 0.3551

5.3396

5.2419

1.0181

−0.5935***

0.0574

−10.3316

 WMb

– 0.0148

0.059

0.2506

1.6497

1.1291

1.4612

3.9783

2.7063

1.4700

0.0326

0.0531

−0.6136

 Cost

0.0034***

0.0009

3.4823

−0.0809***

0.0163

4.9428

0.0359

0.0350

1.0277

0.0008

0.0005

−1.6432

 Travel timec

−0.611***

0.0675

9.0253

0.1395

0.2421

0.5765

−8.5006*

4.0320

2.1083

0.4658***

0.0495

9.4014

 Providerd

−0.3681***

0.0956

3.8476

0.1035

0.4129

0.2507

1.8776

1.3905

1.3503

1.4272***

0.0755

18.8857

Influence factors

 Sexe

   

0.0531

0.0824

 0.6432

0.3077

0.2814

1.0934

−0.0463*

0.1843

−2.5165

 Age

   

−0.0078*

0.0039

2.0104

−0.0625***

0.0131

4.7918

0.0051***

0.0089

−5.6311

 Educationf

   

−0.2644***

0.0667

3.9647

0.2986

0.2035

1.4672

0.1666

0.1397

−1.1932

 Insuranceg

   

0.1496

0.1377

1.0862

4.8480

4.8685

0.9958

0.9840***

0.2904

3.3877

 Severityh

   

0.6134*

0.2713

2.3266

3.1523***

0.4931

6.3928

4.3671***

0.4465

9.7792

Class share

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Predicted membership

551

27.29

763

37.79

15

0.74

690

34.18

  1. Note: In this section, only the significant values are highlighted in bold. The cost and age are continuity variables
  2. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
  3. aCompared with western medicine
  4. bCompared with integrated TCM and WM
  5. cCompared with less than or equal to 30mins
  6. dCompared with GP
  7. ecompared with male
  8. fCompared with shorter length of education(≤9 years)
  9. gCompared without basic medical insurance
  10. hCompared with the assumption that have minor chronic disease