A trial-based economic evaluation of the Restore4Stroke self-management intervention compared to an education-based intervention for stroke patients and their partners

Table 3 Data of the three outcomes for SMI (n = 58) and EDU (n = 55) patients

	Baseline		ANOVA	three months		ANCOVA*		Six months		ANCOVA*	95% CI	12 months		ANCOVA*
	SMI	EDU		SMI	EDU	Group		SMI	EDU	Group		SMI	EDU	Group
	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)		Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	p-value	95% CI	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	p-value		Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	p-value	95% CI
UPCC	2.9 (.57)	2.9 (.51)	.945	2.9 (.58)	2.9 (.58)	.728	−0.22, 0.15	3.0 (.62)	2.9 (.55)	.233	−0.31, 0.08	2.94 (0.69)	2.87 (0.58)	.421	− 0.267,0.113
USER-Participation	70.9 (15.5)	73.4 (16.6)	.423	70.9 (15.1)	71.5 (18.8)	.689	−6.97,4.62	70.3 (16.2)	70.5 (18.4)	.645	−6.95,4.33	73.1 (16.6)	67.6 (19.6)	.013**	−13.08,-1.61
EQ-5D-3 L
Utility	.60 (.31)	.68 (.25)	.158	0.71 (.21)	0.69 (.19)	.051	−0.12, 0.00	0.71 (.21)	.70 (.22)	.330	−0.10,0.04	0.72 (.24)	.68 (.24)	.099	−0.15,0.013
												12 months		ANOVA
												SMI	EDU
QALY***												0.715 (.140)	.672 (.118)	.080

SMI Self-management intervention, EDU education based intervention, UPCC Utrecht Proactive Coping Scale, USER-Participation the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation Participation, EQ-5D-3 L EuroQol descriptive system with three levels, QALY Quality Adjusted Life Years, ANCOVA Analysis of covariance, SD standard deviation, 95 CI% 95% confidence interval
*with baseline score as covariate
**significant p-value < 0.05
***Corrected QALY for baseline utility differences

ISSN: 1472-6963