Skip to main content

Table 3 Data of the three outcomes for SMI (n = 58) and EDU (n = 55) patients

From: A trial-based economic evaluation of the Restore4Stroke self-management intervention compared to an education-based intervention for stroke patients and their partners

 Baseline ANOVAthree months ANCOVA* Six months ANCOVA*95% CI12 months ANCOVA* 
SMIEDU SMIEDUGroup SMIEDUGroupSMIEDUGroup 
Mean (SD)Mean (SD) Mean (SD)Mean (SD)p-value95% CIMean (SD)Mean (SD)p-valueMean (SD)Mean (SD)p-value95% CI
UPCC2.9 (.57)2.9 (.51).9452.9 (.58)2.9 (.58).728−0.22, 0.153.0 (.62)2.9 (.55).233−0.31, 0.082.94 (0.69)2.87 (0.58).421− 0.267,0.113
USER-Participation70.9 (15.5)73.4 (16.6).42370.9 (15.1)71.5 (18.8).689−6.97,4.6270.3 (16.2)70.5 (18.4).645−6.95,4.3373.1 (16.6)67.6 (19.6).013**−13.08,-1.61
EQ-5D-3 L
Utility.60 (.31).68 (.25).1580.71 (.21)0.69 (.19).051−0.12, 0.000.71 (.21).70 (.22).330−0.10,0.040.72 (.24).68 (.24).099−0.15,0.013
            12 months ANOVA 
            SMIEDU  
QALY***           0.715 (.140).672 (.118).080 
  1. SMI Self-management intervention, EDU education based intervention, UPCC Utrecht Proactive Coping Scale, USER-Participation the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation Participation, EQ-5D-3 L EuroQol descriptive system with three levels, QALY Quality Adjusted Life Years, ANCOVA Analysis of covariance, SD standard deviation, 95 CI% 95% confidence interval
  2. *with baseline score as covariate
  3. **significant p-value < 0.05
  4. ***Corrected QALY for baseline utility differences