Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic Agreement Between Different Billing Code Algorithms and Encounter Review Gold Standard

From: Validation of use of billing codes for identifying telemedicine encounters in administrative data

Encounter Review Finding

Claims Algorithm

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Any Telemedicine

GT or GQ present

100%

(−-)

99.99%

(99.98–99.99%)

90.8%

(86.1–94.0%)

100%

(−-)

GT or GQ or 99444 present

100%

(−-)

99.99%

(99.98–99.99%)

90.8%

(86.1–94.0%)

100%

(−-)

Live Interactive Telemedicine

GT present

100%

(−-)

99.93%

(99.92–99.95%)

51.4%

(42.0–60.7%)

100%

(−-)

GT present without GQ or 99444

100%

(−-)

99.99%

(99.98–99.99%)

84.8%

(76.9–90.3%)

100%

(−-)

Store and Forward Telemedicine

GQ present

36.5%

(25.3–49.3%)

100%

(100–100%)

99.1%

(96.3–99.8%)

99.96%

(99.95–99.98)

GQ or 99444

100%

(−-)

100%

(100–100%)

99.7%

(98.6–99.9%)

100%

(−-)

  1. Note: Abbreviations: PPV positive predictive value; NPV negative predictive value