Skip to main content

Table 4 Hemodialysis provider experience with, and perceptions of the utility of, the functioning report, 8/18–9/18

From: Delivery of a patient-friendly functioning report to improve patient-centeredness of dialysis care: a pilot study

Item

n (%)

No. (%) completing survey

12 (70.6%)

Type of hemodialysis provider

 Nephrologist

5 (41.7%)

 Social Worker

4 (33.3%)

 Dietitian

3 (25.0%)

No. (%) reporting receiving 0 reports:

2 (16.7%)

No. (%) reporting that report should be discussed by:

 Nephrologist

8 (66.7%)

 Nurse

6 (50.0%

 Social worker

6 (50.0%)

 Dietitian

5 (41.7%)

 Primary care provider

3 (25.0%)

 Other

1 (8.3%)

 No one

0 (0.0%)

No. (%) reporting discussing reports with patients:

 Always

2 (16.7%)

 Sometimes

6 (50.0%)

 Never

4 (33.3%)

No. (%) reporting training would improve their comfort discussing report:

 In-person training

3 (25.0%)

 Web training

3 (25.0%)

 Role modeling of provider-patient encounters

2 (16.7%)

 Other

1 (8.3%)

 No training needed

5 (41.7%)

Among 8 providers who always or sometimes discussed report with patients

 No. (%) reporting who brought up report:

  Patients brought it up more often

2 (25.0%)

  Provider brought it up more often

4 (50.0%)

  Patients/providers brought it up equally

2 (25.0%)

 No. (%) reporting making recommendations after report discussion:

  Frequently/sometimes

3 (37.5%)

  Rarely/never

5 (62.5%)

 No. (%) reporting making recommendations for:

  Physical therapy

1 (12.5%)

  Patient-driven exercise program

2 (25.0%)

  Occupational therapy/home assessment

1 (12.5%)

  Depression work-up

1 (12.5%)

  Cognitive assessment

1 (12.5%)

  New social service

0 (0.0%)

  Family consult

2 (25.0%)

  Other

0 (0.0%)

  None

1 (12.5%)

 No. (%) reporting they felt comfortable discussing the report with patients

7 (87.5%)

 No. (%) reporting that report led to better communication with patient

3 (37.5%)

Among 10 providers who sometimes or never discussed report with patients

 No. (%) reporting reasons for not discussing report:

  It was not appropriate to discuss

1 (10.0%)

  Provider felt unqualified to discuss

0 (0.0%)

  Provider felt it was not their role to discuss

0 (0.0%)

  There was never enough time

3 (30.0%)

  Information was not important for patient care

0 (0.0%)

  Information was not actionable

1 (10.0%)

  Provider forgot about report

1 (10.0%)

  Provider did not receive report

2 (20.0%)

  Other

2 (20.0%)