Skip to main content

Table 8 By site - Cost-effectiveness of SHHC. ICERs (vs Status Quo) from the societal perspective

From: Cost-effectiveness of a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention intervention in medically underserved rural areas

Site ID

Weight loss

BMI reduction

CRP reduction

Simple 7 increase

ASCVD QALY saved

3

683

1823

*224,455

8392

414,770

5

408

1028

1153

1762

1,290,021

6

*1692

*5099

983

2732

184,905

8

681

1892

1827

1827

430,353

11

436

1729

945

5012

63,429

12

2291

5547

1214

1068

1,264,574

14

719

1854

1055

983

56,118

16

790

2022

1560

2342

*3,674,482

  1. The “*” implies that the effect is in the unexpected direction. For example, an ICER for weight loss with “*” implies that on average participants gained instead of lost body weight after the SHHC
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us