Involving end-users in the design of an audit and feedback intervention in the emergency department setting – a mixed methods study

Table 2 Characteristics of survey respondents

	Involved	≥30% of network involved^a	< 30% of network involved^a	p-value
	(n = 5)	(n = 7)	(n = 5)
Male gender – n (%)	3/5	5/7	4/5	1
Years experience – median (IQR)	10 (10–15)	10 (9–14)	4 (3–9)	0.15
Years in this ED – median (IQR)	10 (6–13)	7 (2–9)	2 (1–5)	0.29
Network centrality measures^a
- Out-degree – median (IQR)	6 (4–7)	5 (3–7)	6 (5–7)	0.88
- In-degree – median (IQR)	6 (4–6)	3 (2–4)	3 (2–6)	0.43
- Closeness – median (IQR)	0.29 (0.25–0.31)	0.30 (0.25–0.33)	0.32 (0.29–0.34)	0.66
- Betweenness – median (IQR)	158 (129–197)	112 (59–204)	88 (34–100)	0.30

Characteristics of physicians who responded to both pre- and post-survey, categorized by involvement in the design process: those who were involved in the development, those of which ≥ 30% of their network was involved in the development, and those of which < 30% of their network was involved. Two physicians did not finish the social network question and were not included in the social network analyses
Abbreviations: ED emergency department, IQR interquartile range, n number
^aNetwork measures were calculated based on the question “Who do you discuss problems with at work?”

ISSN: 1472-6963