Skip to main content

Table 3 Analysis of doctors and others who have used telemedicine (TM)

From: Assessing core, e-learning, clinical and technology readiness to integrate telemedicine at public health facilities in Uganda: a health facility – based survey

Characteristics

TM Users

Non-users

Doctors (n = 74)

Others (n = 93)

Total (n = 167)

TM aware non-users (n = 116)

Unaware of TM (n = 123)

Core Readiness - Awareness of Telemedicine

TM used for

Diagnosis

16 (34.0)

9 (9.7)

25 (15.3)a

Treatment

23 (31.1)

14 (15.2)

37 (22.7)a

Prevention

25 (33.8)

15 (16.1)

40 (24.5)b

e-Learning

30 (40.5)

40 (43.0)

70 (42.9)

Knowledge sharing

21 (28.4)

31 (33.3)

52 (31.9)

e-consultation

47 (63.5)

46 (49.5)

93 (57.1)

e-prescription

60 (81.1)

1 (1.1)

61 (37.4)c

Impressed with TM

74 (100)

81 (87.1)

155 (95.1)c

Core Readiness - Integrating Telemedicine

 TM reduces referrals

65 (87.8)

73 (78.5)

138 (84.7)

89 (76.7)

30 (24.4)c

 TM reduces hospital visits

65 (87.8)

60 (64.5)

125 (76.7)c

99 (85.3)a

52 (42.3)c

 Use TM over traditional methods

67 (90.5)

69 (74.2)

136 (83.4)b

102 (87.9)

67 (54.5)c

Required before TM

Licensing

43 (58.1)

64 (68.8)

107 (65.6)

85 (73.3)

48 (39.0)c

Remuneration

33 (44.6)

52 (55.9)

85 (52.1)

61 (52.6)

20 (16.3)c

Policy

74 (100)

80 (86.0)

154 (94.5)c

97 (83.6)a

58 (47.2)c

Training

68 (91.9)

79 (84.9)

147 (90.2)

63 (54.3)c

66 (53.7)c

Ethical Guideline

69 (93.2)

61 (65.6)

130 (79.8)c

66 (56.9)c

45 (36.6)c

TM solves HWs crisis

70 (94.6)

74 (79.6)

144 (88.3)b

106 (91.4)

81 (65.9)c

Core Readiness - Comfort with Telemedicine

 TM is cost effective

59 (79.7)

93 (100)

152 (93.3)c

98 (84.5)

85 (69.1)c

 Worth investing in TM infrastructure?

73 (98.6)

76 (81.7)

149 (91.4)c

83 (71.6)c

81 (65.9)c

 TM is effective for emergencies

66 (89.2)

86 (92.5)

152 (93.3)

111 (95.7)

96 (78.0)b

Core Readiness – Process Workflow

 TM affects normal process workflow

5 (6.8)

23 (24.7)

28 (17.2)b

5 (4.3)c

24 (19.5)

 TM would alter work practices

24 (32.4)

47 (50.5)

71 (43.6)a

54 (46.6)

44 (35.8)

 TM would change referral process

63 (85.1)

66 (71.0)

129 (79.1)a

113 (97.4)c

53 (43.1)c

Learning Readiness – Enhancing Provider Skill

How do you access Continuing Medical Education?

Conference

71 (95.9)

65 (69.9)

136 (83.4)c

91 (78.4)

70 (60.3)c

Internet

70 (94.6)

56 (60.2)

126 (77.3)c

83 (71.6)

45 (38.8)c

Workshop

74 (100)

63 (67.7)

137 (84.0)c

93 (80.2)

86 (74.1)a

Attend course

26 (35.1)

22 (23.7)

48 (29.4)

42 (36.2)

60 (51.7)c

Consult colleagues

8 (10.8)

11 (11.8)

19 (11.7)

9 (7.8)

17 (14.7)

Could TM enhance e-learning?

62 (83.8)

62 (66.7)

124 (76.1)a

114 (98.3)c

113 (91.9)c

Are HW ready to adopt e-learning?

68 (91.9)

81 (87.1)

149 (91.4)

107 (92.2)

113 (91.9)

Would TM use bridge skills gap?

49 (66.2)

78 (83.9)

127 (77.9)b

104 (89.7)b

119 (96.7)c

Clinical Readiness - Factors

 Use of TM for clinical gaps

67 (90.5)

84 (90.3)

151 (92.6)

109 (94.0)

104 (84.6)

 Agree with treatment outcome

70 (94.6)

85 (91.4)

155 (95.1)

111 (95.7)

99 (80.5)b

 TM will improve clinical outcome

70 (94.6)

85 (91.4)

156 (95.1)

100 (86.2)

100 (81.3)b

Overall Readiness

 HW ready to integrate TM

65 (87.8)

60 (64.5)

125 (76.7)b

68 (58.6)b

64 (52.0)c

  1. a ≤ 0.05, b ≤ 0.01, c ≤ 0.001. Statistical comparison between doctors and others who use telemedicine is shown in the Telemedicine Total column, between users and those aware of telemedicine but not using it in Telemedicine Aware non-users column, and between telemedicine users and telemedicine naïve respondents in the Unaware of TM column