Table 2 Use of PMS in Swedish primary care year 2016/17 according to survey and interviews with county council representatives (N = 19 respondents)
Used for monitoring? | Number of indicators | Used in P4P? | |
|---|---|---|---|
Blekinge | Yes | Four areas | Yes (4 targets) |
Dalarna | Yes | Approx. 30 | Yes (3 targets) |
Gävleborg | Yes | Approx. 30 | Yes (3 targets) |
Halland | Yes | Approx. 80 | Yes (1 target) |
Jönköping | Yes | Approx. 80 | Yes (7 targets) |
Kalmar | Yes | Approx. 15 | No |
Kronoberg | Yes | Approx. 25 | Yes (14 targets including coverage rate) |
Landstinget i Värmland | Yes | Approx. 80 | No |
Norrbotten | Yes | Approx. 40 | Yes (1 target) |
Region Jämtland Härjedalen | Yes | Approx. 50 | No |
Skåne* | Yes | Approx. 80 | Yes (coverage rate) |
Stockholm | Yes | Approx. 80 | Yes (3 targets)** |
Södermanland | Yes | Approx. 70 | Yes (accessibility) |
Uppsala | Yes | Approx. 80 | Yes (7 targets) |
VGR | Yes | Approx. 80 | Yes (9 targets including coverage rate) |
Västerbotten | Yes | Approx. 40 | Yes (6 targets) |
Västernorrland | Yes | Approx. 40 | No (not efter 2016) |
Örebro | Yes | Approx. 65 | Yes (7 targets) |
Östergötland | Yes | Four areas | No |