Skip to main content

Table 5 Hierarchical regression analyses with personal characteristics (1), category (2), social capital, decision latitude and workload (3) and burnout dimensions (4) (explanatory variables) and quality of care unit and hospital (dependent variables)

From: Staff empowerment and engagement in a magnet® recognized and joint commission international accredited academic centre in Belgium: a cross-sectional survey

Quality of care unit: good or excellent (1) versus fair poor (0)

Quality of care unit: excellent (1) versus good or fair or poor (0)

 
 

B

SE

OR

95% C.I.

adjR2

 

B

SE

OR

95% C.I.

adjR2

N = 1032

   

Lower

Upper

 

N = 1032

   

Lower

Upper

 

Generations

  

**

   

Generations

  

***

   

 Generations (Z)

−.663

.491

.52

.20

1.35

 

 Generations (Z)

−1.749

.452

.17***

.07

.42

 

 Generations (Y)

−.990

.312

.37**

.20

.69

 

 Generations (Y)

−.890

.221

.41***

.27

.63

 

 Generations (X)

−.418

.326

.66

.35

1.25

 

 Generations (X)

−.194

.199

.82

.56

1.22

 

 Gender (male)

−.226

.252

.80

.49

1.31

.050

 Gender (male)

−.134

.203

.87

.59

1.30

.072

Category

  

*

   

Category

  

***

   

 Category (1)

−.687

.306

.50*

.28

.92

 

 Category (1)

−1.249

.219

.28***

.19

.44

 

 Category 2)

−1.057

.392

.35**

.16

.75

.056

 Category 2)

−1.653

.343

.19***

.10

.38

.120

 Social capital

1.424

.209

4.15***

2.76

6.26

 

 Social capital

1.329

.178

3.78***

2.66

5.35

 

 Decision latitude

.156

.331

1.17

.61

2.24

 

 Decision latitude

.659

.259

1.93*

1.16

3.21

 

 Workload

−.041

.252

.96

.59

1.57

.225

 Workload

−.130

.187

.88

.61

1.27

.275

 Emotional exhaustion

−.337

.115

.71**

.57

.90

 

 Emotional exhaustion

−.038

.097

.96

.80

1.17

 

 Depersonalisation

−.126

.131

.88

.68

1.14

 

 Depersonalisation

−.442

.142

.64**

.49

.85

 

 Personal accomplishment

.188

.188

1.21

.94

1.56

.259

 Personal accomplishment

.051

.117

1.05

.84

1.32

.293

Quality of care hospital: improved or certainly improved (1) versus deteriorated or certainly deteriorated (0)

Quality of care hospital: certainly improved (1) versus improved or deteriorated or certainly deteriorated (0)

 
 

B

SE

OR

95% C.I.

adjR2

 

B

SE

OR

95% C.I.

adjR2

N = 1021

   

Lower

Upper

 

N = 1021

   

Lower

Upper

 

Generations

  

*

   

Generations

      

 Generations (Z)

1.259

.474

.17***

.07

.42

 

 Generations (Z)

−.502

.539

.61

.21

1.74

 

 Generations (Y)

−.094

.221

.41***

.27

.63

 

 Generations (Y)

−.261

.320

.77

.41

1.44

 

 Generations (X)

−.087

.219

.82

.56

1.22

 

 Generations (X)

−.149

.291

.86

.49

1.53

 

 Gender (male)

0.334

.215

.87

.59

1.30

.072

 Gender (male)

.116

.284

1.12

.65

1.96

.011

Professional Category

 

***

   

Professional Category

     

 Category (1)

−1.394

.284

.28***

.19

.44

 

 Category (1)

−.121

.306

.89

.49

1.61

 

 Category 2)

−1.123

.372

.19***

.10

.38

.120

 Category 2)

−1.042

.586

.35

.11

1.11

.021

 Social capital

.601

.166

3.78***

2.66

5.35

 

 Social capital

.443

.240

1.56

.97

2.49

 

 Decision latitude

.500

.264

1.93*

1.16

3.21

 

 Decision latitude

1.414

.360

4.11***

2.03

8.33

 

 Workload

−.860

.198

.88

.61

1.27

.275

 Workload

−.325

.259

.72

.44

1.20

.115

 Emotional exhaustion

−.142

.091

.96

.80

1.17

 

 Emotional exhaustion

.005

.147

1.01

.75

1.34

 

 Depersonalisation

−.283

.114

.64**

.49

.85

 

 Depersonalisation

−.552

.231

.58*

.37

.91

 

 Personal accomplishment

.023

.110

1.05

.84

1.32

.293

 Personal accomplishment

.354

.203

1.42

.96

2.12

.144

  1. ***P-value < .001; **P-value < .01; *P-value < .05; OR = Odds Ratio 95% CI [lower and upper bound]; Adjusted R2 reported additionally; Baby boomers as indicator; Female as indicator; Medical staff as indicator, nursing staff/category 1, healthcare staff/category 2; Social capital, decision latitude, workload and burnout dimensions mean value
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us