Peer Review reports
From: Impact of a direct-to-consumer information campaign on prescription patterns for overactive bladder
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Jun 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Oct 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse |
| 14 Nov 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Adrian Wagg |
| 28 Dec 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Dec 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse |
| 27 Feb 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Feb 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Apr 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse |
| 21 Apr 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Apr 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Apr 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Apr 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 Apr 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 May 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-018-3147-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.