Skip to main content

Table 2 Individual and organizational antecedents of affective organizational commitment

From: Exploring the differential impact of individual and organizational factors on organizational commitment of physicians and nurses

 

Affective organizational commitmenta

Model 1

Model 2

Executive position

0.106*

0.107*

(0.0520)

(0.0520)

Gender (male)

0.0192

0.0170

(0.0525)

(0.0524)

Age (< 30)

−0.0433

− 0.0427

(0.0497)

(0.0497)

Age (> 50)

0.169**

0.160**

(0.0597)

(0.0597)

Professional experience in hospital (in years)

0.00225

0.00226

(0.00316)

(0.00316)

Professional experience in respective unit (in years)

0.00591*

0.00602*

(0.00288)

(0.00286)

Employment status (full-time)

0.0197

0.0217

(0.0367)

(0.0366)

Support (from leader)

0.246***

0.245***

(0.0240)

(0.0251)

Support (from colleagues)

0.115***

0.112**

(0.0338)

(0.0343)

Autonomy in decision-making

0.0842***

0.0804**

(0.0252)

(0.0256)

Autonomy in work methods

0.0325

0.0329

(0.0262)

(0.0264)

Autonomy in work scheduling

0.0311

0.0271

(0.0195)

(0.0198)

Size (No. of hospital beds)

 

−0.000122**

 

(0.0000407)

Organizational support (from leader)

 

−0.124

 

(0.102)

Organizational support (from colleagues)

 

−0.0663

 

(0.203)

Organizational autonomy in decision-making

 

0.0236

 

(0.150)

Organizational autonomy in work methods

 

0.0631

 

(0.187)

Organizational autonomy in work scheduling

 

0.0822

 

(0.108)

Open communication in organization

 

−0.108

 

(0.164)

Perceived quality of care in organization

 

0.277*

 

(0.113)

Existence of regular interdisciplinary medical conferences

 

0.289*

 

(0.141)

Constant

2.545***

2.265***

(0.0609)

(0.148)

Observations

1444

1444

ICC (null model: 9.90%)

8.07%

4.74%

Model improvement (likelihood-ratio test)

p < 0.001

p < 0.05

  1. aUnstandardized beta coefficients, standard errors in parentheses; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001