From: Online-based interventions for sexual health among individuals with cancer: a systematic review
Author (Year) | Classen (2013) [20] | Schover (2012) [30] | Schover (2013) [31] | Wootten (2014) [32] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Study Purpose Was the purpose stated clearly? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Literature Was relevant background literature reviewed? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Design | RCT | RCT | RCT | RCT |
Sample description Was the sample described in detail? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Sample size justification Was sample size justified? | Y | N | N | N |
Reliable measures Were the outcome measures reliable? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Cronbach’s α were reported | Cronbach’s α were reported | Cronbach’s α were reported | Cronbach’s α were reported | |
Valid measures Were the outcome measures valid? Validity was reported in a prior study | Y | Y | Y | Y |
FSDS-R: construct validity HADS & IIRS: discriminant validity | IIEF: validated in 32 languages FSFI: reported convergent and discriminant validity BSI-18: incremental validity A-DAS: discriminant validity | FSFI: reported convergent and discriminant MSIQ: construct validity BSI-18: incremental validity QLACS: convergent validity | IIEF: validated in 32 languages DASS-21: convergent validity KMS & DSC: discriminant validity | |
Intervention description Intervention was described in detail? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Contamination Clients in the control group did not receive treatment inadvertently? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Cointervention Cointervention was avoided? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Reporting results Results were reported in terms of statistical significance? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Analysis methods Were the analysis method(s) appropriate? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Clinical importance Clinical importance was reported? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Drop-outs Drop-outs were reported? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Conclusion and Implications Conclusions were appropriate given study methods and results | Y | Y | Y | Y |