Skip to main content

Table 2 Final factor structure of staff questionnaire on guided self-help CBT invention for Voices

From: Understanding clinician attitudes towards implementation of guided self-help cognitive behaviour therapy for those who hear distressing voices: using factor analysis to test normalisation process theory

 

M

SD

α

1

2

3

1 Coherence

2.63

0.92

.89

   

 Guided self-help CBT for distressing voices is an appropriate treatment option

   

0.86

  

 I would be happy to refer a client who hears distressing voices to receive guided self-help CBT

   

0.80

  

 I would be willing to refer a client who hears distressing voices to receive guided self-help CBT as part of a research project

   

0.69

  

 Guided self-help CBT for distressing voices would be effective for those with long standing symptoms

   

0.68

  

 Guided self-help CBT for those who hear distressing voices would be unsafea

   

0.67

  

 It is a waste of resources to trial guided self-help CBT for those who hear distressing voicesa

   

0.64

  

 Guided self-help CBT for those who hear distressing voices will be very effective

   

0.61

  

 People who hear distressing voices would not be able to engage in guided self-help CBTa

   

0.61

  

2 Cognitive participation

2.76

1.11

.86

   

 I would be willing to have training to be able to deliver guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

    

0.86

 

 I would be willing to deliver guided self-help CBT for distressing voices as part of my job

    

0.79

 

 It would be possible to find the time to attend two day training course on how to deliver guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

    

0.66

 

 I would be willing to be involved in the development of guided self-help CBT for those with distressing voices

    

0.62

 

 I would be willing to be involved in research that is trialling guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

    

0.57

 

 I would not be prepared to receive training to deliver guided self-help CBT for distressing voicesa

    

0.55

 

3 Reflexive Monitoring

2.28

0.74

.79

   

 Research is a good method of testing a new intervention

     

0.72

 Following clients up after a period of several months to administer clinical measures is a good way to evaluate the effectiveness of guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

     

0.68

 Measures of the distress experience from hearing voices is a good way to evaluate the effectiveness of guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

     

0.68

 Measures of symptom severity e.g. psychosis measures, are a good way to evaluate the effectiveness of guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

     

0.60

 Randomised controlled trials e.g. comparing the treatment to a control group, is a good way to evaluate the effectiveness of guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

     

0.52

 Measures of other clinical symptoms e.g. anxiety and depression, are a good way to evaluate the effectiveness of guided self-help CBT for distressing voices

     

0.49

  1. α = Cronbach’s alpha; aItems have been reverse scored; Scale scores: from 1 (positive attitude) to 7 (negative attitude)
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us