Skip to main content

Table 1 Research setting and response rates

From: Healthcare Quality Improvement and ‘work engagement’; concluding results from a national, longitudinal, cross-sectional study of the ‘Productive Ward-Releasing Time to Care’ Programme

PW Site

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Total

Clinical Specialty

Rehab

Elderly

Surge

Surge

Med

Med

Med

Elderly-Rehab

Med

-

Numbers Surveyed N =

20

45

38

27

25

19

28

24

27

253

T1 Response Rate N =

17 (85%)

43 (95.5%)

23 (60.5%)

22 (81.4%)

9 (36%)

13 (68.4%)

19 (65.5%)

17 (70.8%)

21 (88.8%)

180 (71.1%)

T2 Response Rate N =

13 (65%)

25 (91.3%)

24 (63.1%)

17 (62.9%)

22 (88%)

7 (36.8%)

20 (68.9%)

17 (70.8%)

24 (88.8%)

169 (66.8%)

T1 & T2 Response Rate N =

10 (50%)

24 (53.3%)

13 (34.2%)

13 (48.1%)

4 (16%)

5 (26.3%)

9 (32.1%)

10 (41.6%)

13 (48.1%)

101 (39.9%)

Control Site

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

Total

Clinical Specialty

Rehab

Elderly

Surge

Surge

Med

Med

Med

Elderly-Rehab

Med

-

Numbers Surveyed N =

20

42

35

26

24

26

26

24

26

249

T1 Response Rate N =

18 (90%)

18 (42.8%)

19 (54.3%)

20 (77%)

14 (58.3%)

22 (84.6%)

18 (69.2%)

15 (62.5%)

14 (53.8%)

158 (63.4%)

T2 Response Rate N =

18 (90%)

14 (33.3%)

20 (57.1%)

17 (65.3%)

8 (33.3%)

26 (100%)

20 (76.9%)

21 (87.5%)

17 (65.3%)

161 (64.6%)

T1 & T2 Response Rate N=

15 (75%)

13 (31%)

5 (14.3%)

7 (27%)

6 (25%)

13 (50%)

13 (50%)

9 (37.5%)

10 (38.4%)

91 (36.5%)