Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Research setting and response rates

From: Healthcare Quality Improvement and ‘work engagement’; concluding results from a national, longitudinal, cross-sectional study of the ‘Productive Ward-Releasing Time to Care’ Programme

PW Site 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Total
Clinical Specialty Rehab Elderly Surge Surge Med Med Med Elderly-Rehab Med -
Numbers Surveyed N = 20 45 38 27 25 19 28 24 27 253
T1 Response Rate N = 17 (85%) 43 (95.5%) 23 (60.5%) 22 (81.4%) 9 (36%) 13 (68.4%) 19 (65.5%) 17 (70.8%) 21 (88.8%) 180 (71.1%)
T2 Response Rate N = 13 (65%) 25 (91.3%) 24 (63.1%) 17 (62.9%) 22 (88%) 7 (36.8%) 20 (68.9%) 17 (70.8%) 24 (88.8%) 169 (66.8%)
T1 & T2 Response Rate N = 10 (50%) 24 (53.3%) 13 (34.2%) 13 (48.1%) 4 (16%) 5 (26.3%) 9 (32.1%) 10 (41.6%) 13 (48.1%) 101 (39.9%)
Control Site A B C D E F G H I Total
Clinical Specialty Rehab Elderly Surge Surge Med Med Med Elderly-Rehab Med -
Numbers Surveyed N = 20 42 35 26 24 26 26 24 26 249
T1 Response Rate N = 18 (90%) 18 (42.8%) 19 (54.3%) 20 (77%) 14 (58.3%) 22 (84.6%) 18 (69.2%) 15 (62.5%) 14 (53.8%) 158 (63.4%)
T2 Response Rate N = 18 (90%) 14 (33.3%) 20 (57.1%) 17 (65.3%) 8 (33.3%) 26 (100%) 20 (76.9%) 21 (87.5%) 17 (65.3%) 161 (64.6%)
T1 & T2 Response Rate N= 15 (75%) 13 (31%) 5 (14.3%) 7 (27%) 6 (25%) 13 (50%) 13 (50%) 9 (37.5%) 10 (38.4%) 91 (36.5%)