Skip to main content

Table 2 Party-in-power estimates of linear regressions predicting 2012 level of privatization and health care expenditures by party elected in 2008 (controlling for incumbency, baseline privatization, HDI, and upper middle-class income)a

From: Do elections matter for private-sector healthcare management in Brazil? An analysis of municipal health policy

Party Elected In 2008

Dental

X-rays

Ultrasounds

Hospital Beds

Outsourcing

Health Expenditures

DEM

−0.86 (0.55)

−0.40 (1.02)

1.12 (1.27)

−0.11 (1.16)

−0.35 (0.46)

−.69 (1.19)

PDT

0.15 (0.66)

0.40 (1.21)

1.43 (1.50)

−0.20 (1.33)

−0.23 (0.54)

−2.84* (1.40)

PMDB

−0.02 (0.39)

−0.30 (0.71)

0.32 (0.88)

0.50 (0.79)

−0.45 (0.33)

−0.07 (0.84)

PP

0.21 (0.54)

0.34 (0.97)

−0.81 (1.24)

−1.57 (1.10)

−1.00* (0.45)

−0.48 (1.16)

PPS

−0.16 (1.03)

1.51 (1.84)

−0.72 (2.27)

1.60 (2.10)

0.58 (.84)

−0.29 (2.20)

PR

0.26 (0.62)

−1.28 (1.11)

−2.45. (1.38)

0.90 (1.23)

0.06 (0.52)

1.73 (1.35)

PSB

0.024 (0.68)

0.80 (1.31)

0.49 (1.45)

0.02 (1.30)

0.55· (0.57)

1.05 (1.47)

PSDB

−0.25 (0.46)

−1.67* (0.81)

−2.12* (1.03)

−0.67 (0.96)

0.21 (0.38)

2.02* (0.99)

PT

0.40 (0.52)

0.09 (0.92)

3.51** (1.14)

0.32 (1.01)

1.21** (0.44)

0.11 (1.13)

PTB

0.24 (0.60)

0.51 (1.17)

−0.77 (1.40)

−0.78 (1.25)

−0.58 (0.51)

−0.52 (1.30)

F statistic

40.28

71.60

209.84*

43.86

191.80*

114.11

Num. obs.

4650

3075

2429

2987

4347

4476

  1. a*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, · p < 0.1. Entries are deviations from the mean (standard errors) times 100