Skip to main content

Table 4 Attributions of ‘Success’ and ‘Failure’ in relation to second National Mental Health Plan initiatives

From: An analysis of policy success and failure in formal evaluations of Australia’s national mental health strategy (1992–2012)

Second National Mental Health Plan
Policy Lever Policy Objective Proposal(s) Success Failure
Organisation RCN
Formalise consumer/carer consultation
Increase public and private sector organisations with formal consumer/carer consultation O- Substantively met R- Low level of genuine involvement or consultation
TG- Public/consumer dissatisfaction (perceived change as insufficient)
R&SA
Increase early intervention services for youth
Provide specialist centres for youth early intervention, including assessment and treatment O- Partially met
R- Specialist centres and early intervention services increased
R- Not all groups’ needs met
TG- Not all groups’ needs met
R&SA
Improve service provision for special needs populations
Develop new specialised service models   O- Not met
R- Interventions underdeveloped
Needs of CALD population not met
Lack of service integration
TG- Consumers not satisfied with level of change achieved/scale of impact
R&SA
Improve mental health curricula for Indigenous health workforce
Improve mental health curricula for Indigenous health workforce O- Partially met
R- Mental health curricula and culturally appropriate service models developed
O- Not met
R- Shortage of health workers
Ongoing need to improve links with mainstream services
SS
Shift acute beds to general hospitals
Relocate beds in stand-alone facilities to general hospitals O- Substantively met
R- Beds from stand-alone facilities relocated to general hospitals
 
SS
Improve coordination of care across service providers
Formal protocols and agreements to support continuity of care O- Partially met – system introduced R- Under-utilisation of case managers service
Little measurable improvement in continuity of care
TG- Community and public dissatisfaction
Regulation SQ&E
Increased accountability for reform outcomes
Develop and apply new outcome measures O- Partially met R- Mental health workforce remain reluctant to participate in routine outcome monitoring
TG- Consumers dissatisfied with progress
SQ&E
Improve service quality and standards
National Standards for Mental Health Services O- Partially met R- Mental health workforce remain reluctant to participate in routine outcome monitoring
TG- Consumers dissatisfied with progress
SS
Improve coordination of care across sectors
Review interagency protocols to support continuity of care O- Partially met R- Lack of accountability
Inadequate progress
Finance R&SA
Increase Federal and State/Territory expenditure on mental health
Review allocations under the general health budget for Federal and State/Territory Governments O- Partially met R- Size of sector did not increase
Variable spending across jurisdictions
R&SA
Increase the size of community-based service sector
Grow 24-h staffed community based residential services
Increase government spending on community services
O- Partially met R- Low increase in services compared with closure of hospital services
TG- Consumers report dissatisfaction with improvements
Community Education HR&CA
Reduce discrimination and stigmatisation of mental health consumers
Review media portrayal of mental illness O- Partially met
R- Review conducted
Strategies implemented
I- Use of innovative approach to engage general public in monitoring
R- No outcome measures collected to compare with baseline
HR&CA
Improve mental health literacy (health workers)
Provide mental health training to frontline workers O- Partially met
R- Education materials developed
Strategies implemented
R- Consumers and carers continue to experience stigmatisation and discrimination (by professionals both inside and outside health sector)
HR&CA
Improve mental health literacy (general public)
Frontline service providers to distribute mental health brochures to patients
Educate school children about mental health
O- Partially met
O- Information material availability and distribution improved
Community telephone survey suggested that people consider mental health to be a serious problem and to be more prevalent than in previous decades
O- Little or no substantial improvement in health literacy
R- Materials do not suit all groups (i.e. exclude CALD and other minority groups)
Payment SS
Ensure better links between primary and secondary providers
Introduce new funding models
Review existing MBS items
O- Substantively met  
R&SA
Improve service provision in rural/remote areas
Introduce new specialised funding models O- Partially met
R- Increase in dedicated service programs
Improvement in recognition of special needs of this group
O- Most of NMHS objectives tailored to metropolitan areas
R- Service gaps and workforce shortages in rural and regional areas remain
  1. Key: Reform Priority Area: HR&CA Human Rights and Community Attitudes, RCN Responding to Community Need, SS Service Structures, SQ&E Service Quality and Effectiveness and R&SA Resources and Service Access; Evaluation Measure: O Objectives, R Results, I Innovation, TG Target Group Impact; Unequivocal Successes and Failures appear in bold
  2. Bold letters are used to indicate the evaluation measures