Skip to main content

Table 2 Algorithm characteristics for the identification of thyroid cancer. Optum Research Database, February 1, 2010 - December 31, 2012

From: Performance of claims-based algorithms for identifying incident thyroid cancer in commercial health plan enrollees receiving antidiabetic drug therapies

  

Adjudicated Status

      

Algorithm components identified from claims

Total

Cases

Non-Cases

Positive Predictive Value (PPV)

95% CI

Sensitivitya

95% CI

Specificityb

95% CI

a) ≥ 1 claim with ICD-9 193

141

72

69

51%

43-60

100%

94-100

0%

0-7

b) Any inpatient or outpatient claim with ICD-9 193

119

68

51

57%

48-66

94%

86-98

26%

17-38

c) Primary inpatient claim with ICD-9 193

21

12

9

57%

34-77

17%

09-28

87%

76-93

d) Claim for goiter in baseline

49

30

19

61%

46-74

42%

30-54

72%

60-82

e) No dispensings for levothyroxine in baseline

104

62

42

60%

50-69

86%

75-93

39%

28-52

f) No claims with diagnosis of benign thyroid nodule ≤ 60 days after ICD-9 193

123

69

54

56%

47-65

96%

87-99

22%

13-34

g) Claims for thyroid surgery in follow-up

103

70

33

68%

58-77

97%

89-100

52%

40-64

h) Claims for any non-surgical treatment (chemo, radio-iodine, radiation)

40

38

2

95%

82-99

53%

41-65

97%

89-99

i) Any treatment (non-surgical or thyroid surgery)

104

71

33

68%

58-77

99%

91-100

52%

40-64

Algorithms

1) Thyroid surgery and no baseline levothyroxine

90

60

30

67%

56-72

83%

72-93

57%

44-68

2) Thyroid surgery and ≥2 ICD-9 193 codes ≤ 90 days after surgery

68

62

6

91%

81-96

86%

75-93

91%

81-96

  1. CI Confidence interval, ICD-9 International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision
  2. aThis proxy for sensitivity represents proportion of adjudication-confirmed cases who have the characteristic
  3. bThis proxy for specificity represents proportion of adjudication confirmed non-cases who do not have the characteristic