From: The redistributive effects of copayment in outpatient prescriptions: evidence from Lombardy
Dependent variable | ||
---|---|---|
Independent variables | Copayment (Model #1) | Cost (Model #2) |
Number of prescriptions | 3.805c | 9.055c |
Female | 3.701c | –6.507c |
Age | 0.236c | 0.946c |
Number of children | –0.285c | –2.190c |
Family members with disability | 2.622c | 4.915a |
Dependent spouse | –0.662c | –6.176c |
Self Employed | –1.194c | 0.817 |
Employed | 2.632c | 6.631c |
Retired | 1.694c | –1.715a |
Income classes | ||
<8,000 | –0.546 | –3.672 |
8,001−15,000 | 2.768c | 3.536 |
15,001−24,000 | 3.991c | 9.651a |
24,001−35,000 | 5.613c | 12.61c |
35,001−55,000 | 8.880c | 19.70c |
55,001−75,000 | 7.062c | 10.46b |
>75,001 | –0.48 | –4.908 |
Demand groups | ||
Group #1 | –36.22c | –32.09c |
Group #2 | –36.59c | –61.42c |
Interaction income classes-demand groups | ||
<8,000× Group #1 | –0.535 | –0.891 |
<8,000× Group #2 | –1.068 | 3.676 |
8,001−15,000× Group #1 | –6.199c | –13.24b |
8,001−15,000× Group #2 | –6.126c | –11.03 |
15,001−24,000× Group #1 | –6.092c | –14.79c |
15,001−24,000× Group #2 | –8.025c | –19.92 |
24,001−35,000× Group #1 | –8.092c | –17.79c |
24,001−35,000× Group #2 | –9.537c | –24.93a |
35,001−55,000× Group #1 | –10.06c | -22.44c |
35,001−55,000× Group #2 | –12.23c | –32.42b |
55,001−75,000× Group #1 | –9.340c | –16.85c |
55,001−75,000× Group #2 | –9.743c | –22.48a |
>75,001× Group #1 | –5.991c | –10.16a |
>75,001× Group #2 | –3.142 | –8.194 |
ASL dummies | included | included |
Marital status dummies | included | included |
Constant | 40.12c | 40.48c |
Observations | 2,301,571 | 2,301,571 |
R-squared | 0.607 | 0.166 |
BIC | 24,620,754.3 | 32,831,101.4 |