Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of economic evaluations according to the CHEERS reporting guidelines

From: Menopausal hormone therapy: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness evaluations

Item No

Sectiona

Salpeter et al. 2009 [41]

Lekander et al. 2009a [42]

Lekander et al. 2009b [43]

Ylinkangas et al. 2007 [44]

Zethraeus et al. 2005 [45]

 

Title and abstract

1

In title identify study as an economic evaluation, or use relevant terms & describe interventions compared

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

2

Provide structured summary in the abstract with specified subheadings

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

 

Introduction

3

Provide explicit statement of broader context, state study question & relevance for public policy or practice decisions

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

 

Methods

4

Target population: describe base case population & subgroups analysed including why they were chosen

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

yes

incomplete

5

Setting and location: state relevant aspects of the system(s) in which the decision(s) need(s) to be made

no

no

no

no

no

6

Describe the study perspective & relate this to the costs evaluated

yes

incomplete

yes

incomplete

incomplete

7

Describe the comparators and state why they were chosen

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

yes

incomplete

8

State the time horizon(s) over which costs & consequences are evaluated & say why appropriate

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

9

Report the choice of discount rate(s) used for costs & outcomes; say why appropriate

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

10

Describe choice of health outcomes & their relevance for the type of analysis performed

incomplete

yes

yes

yes

incomplete

11

Describe fully the methods used for identification of included studies & synthesis of clinical effectiveness data

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

12

Describe the population & methods used to elicit preferences for outcomes

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

13

Describe approaches & data sources for estimating resource use; describe research methods for valuing resource items as unit cost

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

14

Give dates of est resource quantities & unit costs, methods for adjusting unit costs to year of reported costs & details regarding conversion to common currency base & exchange rate

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

no

incomplete

15

Describe choice of model & reason for use. Provide figure of model structure.

yes

incomplete

yes

not applicable

incomplete

16

Describe all structural or other assumptions underpinning the decision-analytical model

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

17

Describe methods for dealing with data issues, pooling data, extrapolation, model validation/adjustments & uncertainty

Incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

 

Results

18

Report values, ranges, references & probability distributions for all parameters & reasons/sources for distributions used for uncertainty

yes

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

19

For each intervention report mean values for estimated costs & outcomes, mean comparator differences & if applicable ICERs

yes

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

yes

20

Describe uncertainty effect for parameters & uncertainty in relation to model structure and assumptions

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

21

Describe effect of heterogeneities on cost, outcome or CE

yes

yes

yes

incomplete

yes

 

Discussions

22

Summarise findings, how they support conclusions, fit with current knowledge & their generalisability. Describe limitations

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

 

Other

23

Describe sources of funding, role of funder & any other non-monetary sources of support

Yes

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

incomplete

24

Describe potential for conflict of interest as per journal policy or as per recommendations of International Committee of Med Journal Editors

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

  1. aRecommendations have been condensed to fit the table. A full description of the recommendation corresponding to each item number of the CHEERS checklist can be found at: https://www.ispor.org/workpaper/CHEERS/revised-CHEERS-Checklist-Oct13.pdf