Table 4 t test for equality of means between PD and NPD

Age

Priority

58

42.41

11.630

1.527

0.315

−5.491

1.784

Non priority

71

44.27

9.249

1.098

Length of service in years

Priority

57

10.25

10.151

1.345

0.662

−2.411

3.785

Non priority

68

9.56

7.302

.886

Effectiveness of RKS

Priority

56

3.39

1.056

.141

0.001^a

−.831

−.215

Non priority

71

3.92

.692

.082

Influence of RKS on individual –centric performance

Priority

55

12.9273

2.29213

.30907

0.048^a

.00799

1.47512

Non priority

70

12.1857

1.85170

.22132

Influence of RKS on organization-centric performance

Priority

44

44.0909

6.68500

1.00780

<0.001^b

2.01956

6.84882

Non priority

67

39.6567

5.99887

.73288

Influence of RKS on patient-centric performance

Priority

51

13.3333

2.16949

.30379

<0.001^b

.89327

2.47036

Non priority

66

11.6515

2.10854

.25954

Future responsibilities to be entrusted with RKS

Priority

48

25.8125

6.87783

.99273

<0.001^b

−6.48705

−2.32273

Non priority

69

30.2174

4.49467

.54109

Importance of individual- and organization-centric performance

Priority

24

71.4583

9.67282

1.97446

0.032^a

−5.87383

−.27201

Non priority

64

74.5313

3.62517

.45315

Satisfaction with individual- and organizational-centric performance

Priority

25

58.2400

17.24162

3.44832

0.910

−5.08572

5.70131

Non priority

59

57.9322

7.71220

1.00404