Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations among total hip replacement indicators within the years 2008 and 2009

From: Testing the construct validity of hospital care quality indicators: a case study on hip replacement

   

quality indicator number

  

qi3aa

qi3b

qi3c

qi3e

qi6

qi3d

qi2b

qi4b

qi5b

qi5c

qi5d

CHI-SQUARE TEST

Quality indicator number

Quality

Indicator

Name (indicator type)

Year

           

qi3a

Complication register (Sb)

2008

           

2009

           

qi3b

Appointment within 6 weeks (S)

2008

\

          

2009

19.97

(0.00)c

          

qi3c

Orthopaedic register form (S)

2008

0.57

(0.45)

\

         

2009

0.43

(0.51)

0.09

(0.77)

         

qi3e

Improvement plan (S)

2008

0.29

(0.59)

\

0.13

(0.71)

        

2009

0.28

(0.60)

4.38

(1.00)

0.13

(0.71)

        

qi6

Countrywide

implementation (S)

2008

1.41

(0.24)

\

0.20

(0.66)

0.10

(0.75)

       

2009

0.43

(0.51)

0.09

(0.77)

0.18

(0.67)

0.13

(0.71)

       

INDEPENDENT T-TEST

SPEARMAN CORRELATION COEFFICIENT

qi3d

Complication meeting (S)

2008

yes 11

\

yes 10.5

yes 11

yes 10.8

      

no 8.2

(0.41) d,e

 

no 13

(0.81)

no 0

(0.01)

no 8.0

(0.73)

2009

yes 11.3

yes 11.4

yes 11.7

yes 11.7

yes 11.6

      

no 13.1

(0.86)

no 12

(0.98)

no 4.5

(0.19)

no 4.7

(0.19)

no 7

(0.74)

qi2b

Thrombosis prophylaxis (P)

2008

yes 99.9

\

yes 60

yes 99.9

yes 99.9

0.09

(0.50)f

     

no 100

(0.73)

 

no 100

(0.80)

no 100

(0.86)

no 100

(0.83)

2009

yes 99.9

yes 99.8

yes 99.8

yes 99.8

yes 99.8

0.21

(0.04)

     

no 98.9

(0.19)

no 98.9

(0.18)

no 99.8

(0.89)

no 99.4

(0.52)

no 100

(0.65)

qi4b

Transfusion of homologous blood (P)

2008

yes 90.7

\

yes 91

yes 99.1

yes 90.9

-0.16

(0.26)

0.08

(0.58)

    

no 98.4

(0.09)

 

no 90.7

(0.98)

no 100

(0.09)

no 97.4

(0.12)

2009

yes 91.8

yes 91.5

yes 92

yes 91.8

yes 91.5

0.01 (0.91)

0.17

(0.12)

    

no 89.3

(0.57)

no 94.1

(0.70)

no 82.9

(0.26)

no 75.8

(0.17)

no 93.6

(0.55)

qi5b

Perioperative antibiotics (P)

2008

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\

   

2009

yes 99.7

yes 99.6

yes 99.6

yes 99.7

yes 99.6

0.15

(0.16)

0.27

(0.01)

0.15

(0.17)

   

no 99.2

(0.60)

no 100

(0.07)

no 100

(0.06)

no 97.8

(0.39)

no 100

(0.06)

qi5c

Antibiotics 60–15 min (P)

2008

yes 97.1

\

\

yes 99

yes 97.2

0.15

(0.26)

-0.04

(0.79)

-0.11

(0.45)

\

  

no 100

( 0.29)

  

no 50

(0.51)

no 100

(0.74)

2009

yes 98

yes 98

yes 98.4

yes 98

yes 97.9

0.10

(0.32)

0.28

(0.01)

0.12

(0.25)

0.46

(0.00)

  

no 99

(0.57)

no 100

(0.04)

no 88.5

(0.28)

no 100

(0.03)

no 100

(0.03)

qi5d

Wound infections (O)

2008

yes 0.8

\

yes 0.8

yes 0.84

yes 0.8

0.12

(0.39)

-0.03

(0.84)

-0.28

(0.05)

\

0.20

(0.14)

 

no 1.0

(0.74)

 

no 1.0

(0.60)

no 0.44

(0.26)

no 0.3

(0.17)

2009

yes 0.01

yes 0.01

yes 0.01

yes 0.01

yes 0.01

0.01

(0.91)

-0.04

(0.71)

-0.19

(0.07)

-0.03

(0.74)

0.04

(0.74)

 

no 0.01

(0.43)

no 0.02

(0.001)

no 0.0

(0.42)

no 0.01

(0.72)

no 0.01

(0.89)

  1. a numbers indicate indicator numbers according to vertical indicator numbering
  2. b S = structure, P = process, O = outcome
  3. c x2 test (p-value)
  4. d t-test: mean group 1, 2 (p-value)
  5. e Interpretation: Of hospitals having an complication register, 11 % reported to hold complication meetings, compared to 8,2 % of those who do not have an complication register (p-value = 0.41)
  6. f Spearman correlation coefficient (p-value)
  7. bold numbers indicate significance