Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient ‘users’ and ‘non-users’

Table 3 Participant details of ‘non-users’ who have withdrawn/declined

Participant	Service profile	Gender	Age	Medical condition	Equipment
Barry	Telecare standalone	Male	59	Stroke	Pendant and pager
Arthur	Telehealth standalone	Male	92	Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease	Telehealth: Pulse & temp
Casey	None^a	Female	32	Myalgic Encephalomyelitis	None^a
Joan	Telecare standalone	Female	49	Multiple Sclerosis	Pendant and pager
Jean	Telecare standalone	Female	82	Falls	Pendant and pager
Margaret	Telehealth standalone	Female	75	Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease	Pulse Oximeter
Ken	Standalone	Male	66	Parkinson’s	Wrist worn medication reminder
Jim	None^a	Male	52	Pancreatitis	None^a
Ian	Telehealth- standalone	Male	69	Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease	Oxygen and temp equipment
Edith	Standalone	Female	92	Congenital palsy osteoporosis	Dossett Box^a
Della	Telecare- standalone	Female	68	Parkinson’s Disease	Medical arm
James	Telecare-standalone	Male	24	Brain injury	Bed leaving alarm kit

ISSN: 1472-6963