Skip to main content

Table 3 Barriers of the integrated care interventions by Implementation Model levels

From: Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review

Ref.

Innovation

Individual Professional

Patient

Social Context

Organisational Context

Economic & Political Context

[39]a

- Delayed software installation

  

- Competing staff priorities

  

[40]a

- No useful outcome data

   

- Workflow changes

 

[44]

- Wireless Internet

 

- Using self-management tools

- Committed staff

- Location of computer in practice

- Funding

- Software updates

 

- Staff priorities

- Uncertain programme sustainability

[32]

  

- Unwillingness to consult experts

 

- Too broad referral indication

 

[41]a

      

[45]

- Unavailability of wireless Internet

    

- High costs

[42]

   

- Difficult local context

  

[54]

- Lack of IT system

- Unwillingness to share care

- Unwillingness to consult experts

- Suboptimal leadership

- Information provision

- Restricting legal regulations

- Perceived inexpertise

- Lack of motivation/compliance/knowledge

- Rivalry

- Communication

- Lack of (educational) structure

[37]

 

- Low engagement

    

- High attrition rate

[26]

 

- High attrition rate

    

[33]

      

[50]

  

- Lack of prompting

- Culture/behavioural changes

- Location of computer in practice setting

 

- Time constraints

- Unavailability of technology

- Personal factors affecting IT use

[55]

 

- Resistance to messaging

- Unawareness of system features

   

[25]

 

- Reluctance to discharge patients

- Reluctance to be discharged

   

[48]

 

- Understanding/implementing diabetes education

 

- Safety issues (neighbourhoods, patients)

- Provider training

 

- Staff turnover

- Large caseloads

- Using tools

- Wide geographical area

[27]

      

[34]

- Lack of IT support

 

- Language and literacy problems

- Lack of leadership support

- Time constraints

 

- Manual data entry

- Limited staff capacity

- High staff turnover

[28]

  

- Medically and socially complicated patients

 

- Limited staff capacity

 

[29]

- Long consultations

- Reluctance to use IT

 

- Culturally diverse setting

  

- Translating materials

- Use of interpreters

[30]

- Registry building (multiple data sources, inconsistent formatting)

- Unwillingness to share data

 

- Changing culture

- Changing the workflow and culture of the practice

- Funding concerns

- Implementing/teaching change model

- Uncertain programme sustainability

[51]

- Accommodating self-management tools at home

 

- Inexperience with self-management tools

   

[43]

      

[35]

      

[38]

- Lack of registry

 

- Lack of self-motivation

 

- Space limitations

 

- Difficulties in building a registry

 

- Time constraints

[31]

- Lack of integrated approach to information management

     

[52]

 

- Difficult computer use

- Difficult computer use

   

[56]

 

- Psychosocial barriers

 

- Competing staff priorities

  

- Lack of openness to innovation

[53]

- Intervention complexity

- Fear of losing patients

- Lack of patient self-motivation

 

- Implementing workflow changes

- Income concerns

- Funding concerns

- Lack of diabetes-specific expertise

- Administrative burden

- Uncertain programme sustainability

- Isolated work

- Lack of staff

[46]

      

[49]

- Intervention complexity

     

[36]

- Implementation of registry

 

- Economically complicated patients

 

- Implementing workflow changes

 

- Unanticipated staff changes

[47]

      
  1. aindicates articles with lower methodological quality. Empty cells indicate that no barriers were mentioned in the category