Skip to main content

Table 4 Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of secondary prevention for diabetic foot

From: The cost of illness attributable to diabetic foot and cost-effectiveness of secondary prevention in Peru

Comparison

Standard care vs. sub-optimal care

Standard care plus temperature monitoring vs. sub-optimal care

Standard care plus temperature monitoring vs. standard care

Differences in costs (∆ costs)

Direct costs

-US$2,724,815

US$22,329,464

US$25,054,279

Direct costs + Indirect costs

-US$8,037,824

US$13,024,440

US$21,062,264

Differences in deaths (∆ deaths)

791

1,385

594

Differences in major amputations

2,087

3,656

1,568

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (∆ costs/∆ deaths)

Direct costs

Cost-saving

ICER = 16,124

ICER = 42,169

Direct costs + Indirect costs

Cost-saving

ICER = 9,405

ICER = 35,450