Skip to main content

Table 3 Selected general practitioner (GP) baseline characteristics by intervention status1

From: Impact of referral templates on the quality of referrals from primary to secondary care: a cluster randomised trial

 

Intervention group

Control group

p-value

GP surgery variables2

List size

830.79 ± 208.78

865.48 ± 100.69

p = 0.475

Female/male GP, n (%)

14 (58.33)/10 (41.67)

10 (43.48)/13 (56.52)

p = 0.308

Specialist yes/no, n (%)

18 (75)/6 (25)

11 (47.83)/12 (52.17)

p = 0.055

Years experience

16.02 ± 10.40

15.15 ± 11.15

p = 0.784

Years experience in hospital

2.81 ± 5.94

1.89 ± 3.06

p = 0.510

Number of GPs in surgery

4.33 ± 1.61

4.04 ± 1.58

p =0.536

 - median

5

5

 

 - mode

5

5

 

GP referral variables per referral in dataset2

Female/male referring GP, n (%)

182 (64.77)/99 (35.23)

93 (42.47)/126 (57.53)

p < 0.000014

Number of GPs in surgery

4.43 ± 1.46

4.01 ± 1.62

p =0.0033

Specialist yes/no n (%)

189 (67.26)/92 (32.74)

114 (52.05)/105(47.95)

p = 0.0005564

Years experience

16.21 ± 11.96

15.41 ± 11.70

p = 0.456

Years experience in hospital

1.54 ± 1.88

1.54 ± 2.46

p = 0.994

Other variables per referral in dataset2

Electronic/paper referral n (%)

281 (100)/0 (0)

213 (97.26)/ 6 (2.74)

p = 0.0053

  1. 1Two GPs shared two lists at two separate surgeries, both in the intervention group. Weighted analysis taking this into account did not lead to significant change in the baseline characteristics
  2. 2Data are presented as mean ± SD or number (%)
  3. 3Significant at p < 0.01
  4. 4Significant at p < 0.001