Skip to main content

Table 7 Basic results. Cost-effectiveness analysis (Cost/QALY gained)a

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of dabigatran and anticoagulation monitoring strategies of vitamin K antagonist

Years since initiation

PSM vs PC

PSM vs Hpc

PSM vs Hvp

PSM vs Dabi

1

12,289 €

4960 €

9120 €

Dominant

2

3519 €

Dominant

275 €

Dominant

3

770 €

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

4

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

5

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

10

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

Lifetime

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

Dominant

  1. PSM Patient self-management; PCpc Primary care with portable coagulometer; Hpc Hospital with portable coagulometer; Hvp Hospital with venipuncture; Dabi Dabigatran
  2. aThe basic results are shown from the perspective of the health system. In the analysis from the social perspective, PSM was the dominant option in all cases except for the analysis at 1 year vs. PCpc, in which the iCER was 7352 € per QALY gained