Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Healthcare utilization and expenditures for chronic and acute conditions in Georgia: Does benefit package design matter?

Original Submission
22 May 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
19 Feb 2015 Editorially accepted
4 Mar 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12913-015-0755-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page