Cost-effectiveness of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG): evidence from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Zambia and Zimbabwe

Table 6 Random effects models for cost

	Model 5	Model 6	Model 7	Model 8	Model 8a³
Early application	1.957 (6.55)	3.14 (6.63)	15.51 (8.40)*	7.75 (6.99)	16.04 (4.96)***
Zimbabwe¹		−7.63 (6.81)	8.81 (9.47)
Zimbawe#EarlyApplication			−32.67 (13.64)***
Lusaka²				ref	ref
Harare 1				−38.75 (11.5)***
Harare 2				−9.52 (8.19)
Copperbelt1				−36.31 (11.40)***	−35.84 (6.62)***
Copperbelt2				−19.93 (10.91)*	−21.92 (6.35)***
Constant	52.61 (4.16)***	54.88 (4.80)***	50.19 (5.17)***	63.34 (5.62)***	60.45 (3.38)***
Country control	no	yes	yes	no	no
RH controls	no	no	no	yes	yes

***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1.
Note: Standard errors are in parentheses.
¹Reference group is Zambia.
²RH include Lusaka (n = 341), Harare1 (n = 93), Harare2 (n = 211), Copperbelt1 (n = 82), Copperbelt2 (n = 95).
³Model for Zambia only.

ISSN: 1472-6963