| | |
Public sector
|
Private sector
| |
---|
| |
Donors (n = 3)
|
MoH (n = 6)
|
MoF (n = 1)
|
Service providers and managers at district level (n = 6)
|
CSOs (n = 4)
|
Researchers (n = 2)
|
Service provider PNFP (n = 3)
|
Total
|
---|
Agenda setting
|
Strong (1)
| |
3
|
1
| |
1
|
1
| |
6
|
Moderate (2)
| |
1
| | | | | |
1
|
Weak (3)
|
3
|
1
| | |
3
| | |
7
|
No influence (4)
|
1
| | | |
1
| |
2
|
Analytical stage
|
Strong (1)
| |
2
| | | | | |
2
|
Moderate (2)
| |
1
| | |
1
|
1
| |
3
|
Weak (3)
|
3
|
2
| | |
2
|
1
| |
8
|
No influence (4)
|
1
| | |
1
| | |
2
|
Decision making
|
Strong (1)
| |
3
| | | | | |
3
|
Moderate (2)
| | |
1
| | | | |
1
|
Weak (3)
|
3
|
1
| | |
3
|
2
| |
9
|
No influence (4)
|
2
| | |
1
| | |
3
|
Implementation
|
Strong (1)
| |
1
| | | | | |
1
|
Moderate (2)
| |
1
|
1
|
3
| | |
1
|
6
|
Weak (3)
|
3
|
2
| |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
11
|
No influence (4)
|
2
| |
2
|
2
|
1
| |
7
|
- Service providers could only rank at the policy implementation stage.
- MoH: two were not able to rank and were excluded from this analysis.
- Service providers: three were not able to rank and were excluded from this analysis.