Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The aprotinin saga and the risks of conducting meta-analyses on small randomised controlled trials – a critique of a Cochrane review

Original Submission
16 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Måns Rosén
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jerrold Levy
25 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Harbord
17 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Måns Rosén
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Henry
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
19 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-34

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page