Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 5 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Wright |
| 30 Apr 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brenda Happell |
| 11 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Walsh |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Wright |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 17 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brenda Happell |
| 4 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Walsh |
| 19 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Wright |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 22 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Wright |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 2 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Wright |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 2 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.