Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosemary Anne Karmel |
7 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vincent Mor |
24 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Bowe |
25 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Dorly Deeg |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Dorly Deeg |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Bowe |
7 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vincent Mor |
10 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosemary Anne Karmel |
26 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Dorly Deeg |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Dorly Deeg |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
5 Aug 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Aug 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-139 |
You can find further information about peer review here.