DOMAIN | INDICATOR | POSSIBLE INCENTIVE DESIGN |
---|---|---|
QUALITY | • Clinical indicators e.g. % adherence to specific treatment for specific disease | • Incremental payment where evidence of specific indicator |
 | • Adherence to (any) endorsed care path | • Increment for adherence to care path |
 | • Provision of data to allow clinical benchmarking | • Payment for provision of data |
 | • Achievement of hospital accreditation | • Bonus for accreditation |
 | • Complications which arise during course of treatment (such as adverse events) | • Remove complications (which occur after the patient was admitted, contrasting with comorbidities which were present on admission) from the definition of DRG and hence determination of casemix payment |
 | • Score on consumer satisfaction questionnaire | • Incremental payment |
 | • Appropriateness of care such as measured by agreed instrument | • Discount payment for cases which do not meet appropriateness of admission criteria as they are of less 'value' to purchaser |
 | • Propensity to admit conditions that exhibit high geographic variation such as carpal tunnel operations. | • Reduce "profitability" of these cases by discounted payment for admission of high variability conditions |
ACCESS | • Elective surgery waiting times | • Discount/penalties for high percent or number of patients waiting in excess of threshold time |
 |  | • Premium paid for patients treated within acceptable timeframe (or penalty for revenue). |
 |  | • Additional payments (or access to other types of additional funding arrangements) if negotiated target reduction in long wait patients achieved. |
 | • Hospital emergency service times to treatment (by triage category) | • Penalties for failure to achieve threshold treatment time goals |
 | • Long stays in hospital emergency service | • Penalties for number of patients denied timely admission to ward. |
PREVENTION | • Avoidable hospital admissions | • Discounted payment for avoidable admissions |
 | • Avoidable mortality | • Penalty in population funding formula for excess avoidable mortality |
CODING QUALITY AND TIMELINESS | • Timeliness | • Zero payment for submission of data outside specific timeframes |
 | • Incidence of "error" DRGs | • Discounted payment for 'error' DRG codes. |
 | • Coding error as measured by audit | • Penalty for upcoding (eg. double deduction where overcoding found). |