Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature

Original Submission
11 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Capewell
26 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Pearson
1 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Grover
7 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stacey Sheridan
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Capewell
9 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stacey Sheridan
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stacey Sheridan
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
20 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-60

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page