Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of key belief and attitude themes for high and low implementers

From: "Should I and Can I?": A mixed methods study of clinician beliefs and attitudes in the management of lifestyle risk factors in primary health care

Theme

High Implementers

Low Implementers

Congruence with clinician role

â–ªRisk factors perceived to be relevant to the presenting issues and types of clients seen.

â–ªOpportunity to address as part of routine care.

â–ªRisk factors perceived to be less relevant to the clinicians' role and reason for seeing the client.

â–ªConfusion over role boundaries, uncertainty about whether risk factors should be addressed by another health professional.

Perception of client acceptability

â–ªOpportunity to develop rapport with clients.

â–ªLinked discussion of risk factors to the presenting issue.

â–ªUndertook screening for risk factors as part of standard assessment.

â–ªFlexible approach to intervention.

â–ªLess able to link discussion of risk factors to presenting issue.

â–ªConcerned about being seen as judgemental, receiving a negative reaction from clients and damaging clinician-client relationship.

Beliefs about capabilities

â–ªHigh perceived confidence and comfort in addressing risk factors.

â–ªExpressed a lack of knowledge, skills or confidence in addressing risk factor issues in an appropriate way.

Perceived Effectiveness of risk factor intervention

â–ªLow perceived effectiveness but responsibility to provide intervention as part of the role.

â–ªValue of intervention recognised but difficulty in assessing and measuring outcomes.

â–ªLow perceived effectiveness of risk factor intervention.

Clinicians' own lifestyle

â–ªOwn lifestyle habits acted as an enabler for some (eg ex-smoker) or did not influencing risk factor management practices

â–ªOwn lifestyle habits identified as a barrier for some in addressing risk factor issues with clients.