Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Health services research in the public healthcare system in Hong Kong: An analysis of over 1 million antihypertensive prescriptions between 2004–2007 as an example of the potential and pitfalls of using routinely collected electronic patient data

Original Submission
14 Nov 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iain Carey
7 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jochen Moehr
17 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
18 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kari Harno
28 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Donnan
11 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stewart Mercer
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stewart Mercer
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iain Carey
12 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
17 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kari Harno
17 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Donnan
6 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stewart Mercer
Resubmission - Version 4
6 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stewart Mercer
Resubmission - Version 6
7 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
17 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stewart Mercer
Resubmission - Version 7
17 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
20 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Stewart Mercer
Resubmission - Version 8
20 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
25 Jun 2008 Editorially accepted
25 Jun 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-138

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page