Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
10 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leana Uys |
21 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tai Pong Lam |
15 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Bradley C. Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tai Pong Lam |
10 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leana Uys |
14 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
10 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Bradley C. Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
16 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Bradley C. Johnston |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
16 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
20 Dec 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Dec 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-5-78 |
You can find further information about peer review here.