Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Patterson |
| 12 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Edith Willigendael |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 13 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Edith Willigendael |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Patterson |
| 9 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Edith Willigendael |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Mar 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Edith Willigendael |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 21 Mar 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 13 Jun 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Edith Willigendael |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 13 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Jul 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Jul 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-5-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.