Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean scores of ten importance items per country

From: What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views

 

1*

2*

3*

4*

5*

6*

7*

8*

9*

10*

Belarus**

2.42

2.61

3.21

3.34

2.59

3.04

 

2.98

 

2.68

Denmark

3.23

3.22

3.47

2.75

2.37

3.57

2.43

2.62

3.10

2.57

Finland**

 

2.91

3.03

2.84

 

2.87

 

2.86

 

3.00

Greece

3.46

3.10

3.51

3.25

2.64

3.34

3.09

3.23

3.03

2.93

Ireland

3.47

3.15

3.60

2.90

2.42

3.55

3.02

3.01

3.21

2.96

Israel

3.71

3.70

3.84

3.52

3.07

3.75

3.40

3.14

3.51

3.12

Italy

3.10

2.89

3.23

2.63

1.95

3.12

2.79

2.70

2.03

2.39

Netherlands

3.21

3.28

3.59

3.24

2.50

3.42

3.01

3.33

3.27

3.29

Norway

3.42

3.14

3.60

3.08

2.46

3.57

3.00

2.81

3.17

2.56

Portugal

3.61

2.94

3.61

3.19

2.78

3.42

3.64

3.42

3.44

3.28

UK

3.37

3.20

3.44

3.02

2.57

3.40

3.21

3.27

3.46

3.20

Ukraine**

2.68

2.77

3.37

3.46

2.71

3.21

 

2.88

 

2.92

Overall

3.24

3.07

3.45

3.10

2.54

3.35

3.05

3.02

3.13

2.90

  1. * See table 2 for the wording of the items.
  2. ** Not all ten items were used in these countries.
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us