Peer Review reports
From: What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sep 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin McKee |
| 8 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marilyn Oermann |
| 15 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Groenewegen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marilyn Oermann |
| 18 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin McKee |
| 7 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Groenewegen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Feb 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Feb 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-5-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.