Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Mar 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 14 Apr 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Thom |
| 16 Apr 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann O'Malley |
| 28 Jun 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Jun 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Jul 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann O'Malley |
| 2 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 2 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 2 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 29 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 29 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 29 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 29 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 1 Sep 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 1 Sep 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Sep 2004 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Sep 2004 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-4-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.