Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Mar 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
14 Apr 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Thom |
16 Apr 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann O'Malley |
28 Jun 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Jun 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Jul 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann O'Malley |
2 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
29 Aug 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
29 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
1 Sep 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Rahul Shenolikar |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
1 Sep 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
7 Sep 2004 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Sep 2004 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-4-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.